How Queen Elizabeth II Showed Why Britain Still Has a Monarchy

ADD TIME ON GOOGLE

Lily Rothman

by

Lily Rothman

Open follow modal

Personalized Content

Lily Rothman

Lily Rothman

Follow this author to personalize your feed and get instant alerts.

FollowGo to your personalized feed

WHY FOLLOW?

Update your preferences in Account Settings

Close

Rothman is managing editor at TIME.

Sep 8, 2022 5:36 PM CUT

Queen Elizabeth II

Queen Elizabeth II in her Coronation gown, with the Duke of Edinburgh, inside the Parliament House, Wellington, New Zealand during the State Opening of Parliament circa 1954.

Queen Elizabeth II in her Coronation gown, with the Duke of Edinburgh, inside the Parliament House, Wellington, New Zealand during the State Opening of Parliament circa 1954.Fox Photos/Getty Images

Lily Rothman

by

Lily Rothman

Open follow modal

Personalized Content

Lily Rothman

Lily Rothman

Follow this author to personalize your feed and get instant alerts.

FollowGo to your personalized feed

WHY FOLLOW?

Update your preferences in Account Settings

Close

Rothman is managing editor at TIME.

Sep 8, 2022 5:36 PM CUT

These days, discussion of whether the British monarchy is obsolete or harmful isn’t exactly surprising. In fact, the purpose of the monarchy has been a common question for decades—TIME addressed that matter in a cover story in 1992, the year Queen Elizabeth II dubbed an “annus horribilis”—and was even so when the Queen, who died Thursday, Sep. 8 at age 96, came to the throne after her father’s death in 1952.

(The Queen had been scaling back her public duties in the last few years due to declining health, though she met with new Prime Minister Liz Truss, her 15th U.K. leader, just two days before her death.)

June 29, 1959

The Queen on the June 29, 1959, cover of TIME TIME

Buy a print of the Queen Elizabeth II 1959 cover here

But, as TIME noted then, Queen Elizabeth II answered the question easily. Celebrating her ascension, the magazine noted that respect for the crown bound the diverse Commonwealth nations together:


“”


Soon after, when she was named TIME’s Woman of the Year, that reasoning was expanded upon. That year, military men who divided the Earth along political and ideological boundaries dominated the world. Among them, Queen Elizabeth stood as the illustration of unity.

See Every TIME Cover Featuring Queen Elizabeth II

Apr. 29, 1929

Then-Princess "Lilybet" on the Apr. 29, 1929, cover of TIME TIME

Mar. 31, 1947

Then-Princess Elizabeth on the Mar. 31, 1947, cover of TIME Cover Credit: BORIS CHALIAPIN

Advertisement

Feb. 18, 1952

Queen Elizabeth on the Feb. 18, 1952, cover of TIME, following her ascension to the throne Cover Credit: BORIS CHALIAPIN

Jan. 5, 1953

Queen Elizabeth, as Person of the Year for 1952, on the Jan. 5, 1953, cover of TIME Cover Credit: BORIS CHALIAPIN

June 29, 1959

The Queen on the June 29, 1959, cover of TIME TIME

Advertisement

May 3, 1976

Queen Elizabeth (at top)—along with Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden, Juan Carlos of Spain, Margrethe of Denmark, and Bernhard and Juliana of the Netherlands—on the May 3, 1976, cover of TIME Cover Credit: (TOP, CLOCKWISE) SERGE LEMOINE-SYGMA; AGENCE NORMA; EDDIE ADAMS; HUBERT LE CAMPION-SYGMA; DANIEL SIMON-GAMMA/LIAISON

June 3, 2002 - TIME Europe

Queen Elizabeth on the June 3, 2002, cover of TIME's Europe edition, marking her Golden Jubilee Cover Credit: KARSH / CAMERA PRESS

Apr. 17, 2006

Queen Elizabeth on the Apr. 17, 2006, cover of TIME's Europe edition, at the time of her 80th birthday Cover Credit: PHOTOGRAPH BY ANWAR HUSSEIN COLLECTION -- LFI

Advertisement

May 14, 2007

The Queen appears (near the bottom right) as a member of the TIME 100 on the May 14, 2007, cover of TIME Cover Credit: PHOTO-ILLUSTRATION FOR TIME BY SEAN MCCABE

June 4, 2012

Queen Elizabeth on the June 4, 2012, cover of TIME's Europe edition, marking her Diamond Jubilee Cover Credit: EQUANIMITY BY CHRIS LEVINE (ARTIST) AND ROB MUNDAY (HOLOGRAPHER)

The Queen Elizabeth II 1926-2022

© Cecil Beaton— Victoria and Albert Museum, London

Advertisement

And not, TIME noted, because she was queen. Plenty of royals from plenty of nations had failed to bring their people together. Her throne was “long since shorn of its last vestige of political power.” Her power was not the work of tradition alone. Her significance depended not simply upon her job, but also on who she was, ”a fresh young blossom on roots that had weathered many a season of wintry doubt”:


“”


Throughout her reign, she continued to combine personal charisma and professional distance to make sure that the monarchy remained, if nothing else, something that had reason to exist. For example, amid “signs of creeping apathy toward the crown,” per TIME, she undertook an attempt to seem more accessible. But, even though that accessibility never truly translated to informality, it worked.

Advertisement

In 2007, TIME included her on its annual list of the most influential people in the world, for being reason enough to dismiss any chatter about the monarchy coming to an end.

Which should have been no surprise. After all, when she had been only a girl, as Princess Lilibet, she began the years of grooming that would make her a woman worthy of the throne—and aware of what that duty would require.

“You are not a fairy-tale princess,” TIME reported in 1944 her mother reminding her, “but a real one.”

Buy a print of the Queen Elizabeth II commemorative cover here