
-
Politics
Open follow modal
Personalized Content
Politics
Follow this section to personalize your feed and get instant alerts.
FollowGo to your personalized feed
WHY FOLLOW?
- Custom Feed: See the stories that matter most to you.
- Smart Alerts: Get notified about major news as it happens.
Update your preferences in Account Settings
Close
-
2016 Election
Open follow modal
Personalized Content
2016 Election
Follow this tag to personalize your feed and get instant alerts.
FollowGo to your personalized feed
WHY FOLLOW?
- Custom Feed: See the stories that matter most to you.
- Smart Alerts: Get notified about major news as it happens.
Update your preferences in Account Settings
Close
Watch Rand Paul Shush a Reporter During a Cranky Interview

by
Nolan Feeney
Open follow modal
Personalized Content

Nolan Feeney
Follow this author to personalize your feed and get instant alerts.
FollowGo to your personalized feed
WHY FOLLOW?
- Custom Feed: See the stories that matter most to you.
- Smart Alerts: Get notified about major news as it happens.
Update your preferences in Account Settings
Close
Feb 2, 2015 11:27 PM CUT


by
Nolan Feeney
Open follow modal
Personalized Content

Nolan Feeney
Follow this author to personalize your feed and get instant alerts.
FollowGo to your personalized feed
WHY FOLLOW?
- Custom Feed: See the stories that matter most to you.
- Smart Alerts: Get notified about major news as it happens.
Update your preferences in Account Settings
Close
Feb 2, 2015 11:27 PM CUT
A CNBC anchor discovered the quickest way to get on Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul’s bad side Monday with a series of questions the 2016 presidential hopeful said were “mischaracterized” and “argumentative” and “full of distortions.”
CNBC’s Closing Bell co-anchor Kelly Evans began her interview by asking about Paul’s stance on vaccines, but their conversation didn’t get heated until she asked him about his and California Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer’s recent tax proposal. Things got tense when he challenged Evans’ research—at one point, he shushes her and instructs her to “calm down”—and it only went downhill from there after she moved on to other topics, including a possible 2016 run.
“We are thinking about it… [but] part of the problem is that you end up having interviews like this where the interview is so slanted and full of distortions that you don’t get useful information,”Paul said. “I think this is what is bad about TV sometimes. So frankly, I think if we do this again, you need to start out with a little more objectivity going into the interview.”